Before I began working on this project I did not look at Voyeur at all except in the work shop when it was briefly explained.Â All I remembered from the workshop on Voyeur was that there was some sort of bubble chart and tree chart involved.Â When I began to fiddle around with Voyeur (or Voyant) I quickly realized there was far more to Voyeur than a bubble chart.Â My group and I discovered it was actually a median with sixteen tools that allows you to customize your own page to how you would like to analyze the text.Â These sixteen tools are all very similar; they differ mainly by frequency and visual elements.Â You just choose your own tools and create your own page. Â So if you are someone who likes to compare words, characters, and themes with more of a visual component then you can customize the page to fit with your choice of visual tools.Â If you prefer frequency charts and specific numbers, than you can analyze the text with the frequency tools.
Once my group and I began to explore Voyeur and all the tools on our own, we all found it to be very user friendly.Â Words are easy to find and compare within a large text by clicking onto it in the text or chart.Â Voyeur highlights each time the word appears within the text.Â If you clicked on â€œloveâ€, for example, in the word cloud or any other tool you choose to use, it instantly highlights the word â€˜loveâ€™ each time it appears.Â You can upload your own pdf files into Voyeur to analyze it or you can copy and paste the links.Â Voyeur also allows you to take away any words you do not need.Â For example, if you upload 3.4 of Hamlet, words such as â€œandâ€, â€œitâ€, â€œIâ€, and so on appear as most frequent.Â However, you can take those words out of the text by using an option to do so.Â This then allows you to see the important themes more clearly in the visual and frequency tools.
One of the major downfalls I found with Voyeur is that the program does not give you any clear directions to follow.Â You have to play around with it and not get frustrated when you cannot figure something out easily.Â Another disadvantage is that the frequency of a particular word might not be accurate.Â For example, my group and I compared the words â€œgoodâ€ and â€œevilâ€.Â â€˜Goodâ€™ appeared more frequently than â€˜evilâ€™ on the word cloud tool.Â But when we looked at the actual pdf text we realized that Voyeur was picking up on â€˜goodâ€™ in words like â€œgood nightâ€.Â As you can see, this can be a problem because if we had not realized this we would have come to the conclusion that â€˜goodâ€™ as a theme is spoken more often than â€˜evilâ€™.
My main goal now is to come up with a clear hypothesis to focus on in 3.4, similar to how we focused on the Oedipus complex in our Wednesday lecture, so that I can find out more glorious things about all that is Hamlet with the help of Voyeur. Here is a link to all the variousÂ Voyeur ToolsÂ that I mentioned. Â You can see an individual image of each tool if you scroll down. Â Check it out!